शिर्डी साईं का पर्दाफाश

देखे साईं का चरित्र – https://hindurashtra.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/exposesai.pdf

यान्ति देवव्रता देवान् पितृन्यान्ति पितृव्रताः
भूतानि यान्ति भूतेज्या यान्ति मद्याजिनोऽपिमाम्
गीता में भी भगवान श्रीकृष्ण कहते हैं कि भूत प्रेत, मूर्दा (खुला या दफ़नाया हुआ अर्थात् कब्र अथवा समाधि) को सकामभाव से पूजने वाले स्वयं मरने के बाद भूत-प्रेत ही बनते हैं.

साईं उर्फ़ चाँद मियां की मजार या दरगाह, अब साईं भक्त ये बताये की भगवान् कृष्ण सही है या साईं??
साईं एक इस्लामिक बुद्धि का व्यक्ति और और अल्लाह का एक सिपाही है जिसका काम मुर्ख हिन्दुओ को अपने जाल में फस कर इस्लामिक सत्ता कायम करना है यही काम अजमेर के ख्वाजा चिस्ती ने किया था और दिल्ली के हजरत निजामुद्दीन ने किया.. पर अक्सर लोग इस भूल में जीते रहते है की उनकी तो कब्र है पर साईं की तो मूर्ति है जिसे मुसलमान पूजते है नहीं है और यही पर लोग मुर्ख बन जाते है असल में कुरान के कहे अनुसार साम दाम दंड भेद जैसे भी हो इस्लामी सत्ता कायम करना ही मुसलमानों का फ़र्ज़ है जिसे पूरा करने में साईं ने पूरी इमानदारी दिखाई और आज उसकी इसी बात का फायदा मुसलमान उठा रहे है
शिर्डी से प्रकाशित साईं सत्चरित्र के सन्दर्भ से लिए गए साईं के कुछ कारनामे और साईं के सनातनी विरोधी कुछ कार्य, इसी में साईं के एक मुस्लिम होने का प्रमाण भी है, यही नहीं इसमें साईं के प्रसाद में मांस मिलाने और एक ब्राह्मण को मांस मिला भोजन खिलाने के लिए बाध्य करने के कुछ प्रमाण है,
मेरे एक मित्र एवं एक पूर्व साईं भक्त द्वारा गया मुझे लिखा गया एक पत्र, जिसमे साईं इस्लाम को अच्छा बता कर भारत की संत परम्परा एवं भारतीय मुनियों ऋषियों व् महापुरुषों का अपमान करता है जो सदियों से इस्लामिक पिशाच से लड़ते हुए भारत भूमि को बचाए हुए है..
सनातनी परंपरा में केवल इश्वर, अवतार, या देवता की पूजा ही मान्य है उसके अलावा सभी एक तरह से पाखंड ही है,
चूँकि साईं न इश्वर है न देवता और न अवतार इसलिए वह भी एक प्रकार से पूजनीय व्यक्तियों की श्रेणी में नहीं आता, एक साधारण इंसान होते हुए भी उसे इश्वर की तरह पूजा जाना सनातन धर्म का ही घोर अपमान है.
गीता में भगवान् कृष्ण का सन्देश व् दफनाये गए व्यक्तियों को पूजने पर भगवान् कृष्ण की स्पष्ट चेतावनी,
https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/06/26/fake-sai-2/साईं के अवतारी होने का भंडाफोड़ एवं साईं के चमत्कारों का पर्दाफाश,
https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/06/26/122/

साईं का पूजन अर्थात सनातनी धर्म का घोर अपमान, क्या एक यावनी(मुसलमान) सनातनी भगवान् हो सकता है, वो यावनी जो हजारो सालो से भारत भूमि को रक्त में डुबोते हुए तलवार के जोर पर हजारो लाखो स्त्रियों का चीरहरण व् करोड़ो भारतवासियों की हत्या करने उनका जबरन धर्मांतरण करा चुके है, साथ ही इस झूठ का गुब्बारा फोड़ना की साईं ने अपने जीवन में समाज के कल्याण के लिए कोई कार्य किये है.
https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/06/19/fake-sai

साईं के कुछ मुर्ख भक्त है जो साईं कटुवे को शिव राम या कृष्ण ने जोड़ रहे है और अपने सनातन धर्म का मखोल उड़ा कर पूरी दुनिया में सनातन धर्म को बदनाम कर रहे है,
ऐसे साईं भक्तो को मेरा खुला चैलेंज, हिम्मत है तो साईं को हिन्दू साबित करे भगवान की बात तो बहुत दूर की है,
ऐसे साईं भक्तो को मेरी सलाह, क्या ये साईं राम शिव से बड़ा हो गया,
क्या साईं की पूजा करने वालो को ये पता है की सनातन धर्म में किस विग्रह की पूजा होती है किसकी नहीं??
क्या साईं भक्ति को पता है की सनातन धर्म में विग्रह स्थापना का क्या विधान है??
क्या सनातन धर्म भगवान् की तरह गुरु की पूजा करने की अनुमति देता है, जैसे की कुछ लोग इसे सिर्फ गुरु बता रहे है.
साईं भक्तो को सलाह की वो अपनी आखे खोले और इस साईं की पूजा को बंद करके सनातन धर्म के असली स्वरुप को पहचाने,
जय श्री राम,
जय भगवान परशुराम,
जय सनातन धर्म
जय हिन्दुराष्ट्र,

44 thoughts on “शिर्डी साईं का पर्दाफाश”

  1. साईं का मतलब है साक्षात् इश्वर.
    और साईं ने तो कहा था “सबका मालिक एक” भगवान एक है.
    लेकिन आप जैसे लोग जात धर्म के नाम से भगवान को बटोरते है…

    तुझे एक दिन अकल आ जाएगी मुर्ख!

    !!जय साईनाथ महाराज की जय!!

    • आपको इतना समझाने पर भी अक्ल नहीं आई और दुसरो को नसीहत दे रहे है, खुद तो समझे पहले, साईं का अर्थ जो आपने बताया सही है पर ये साईं का असली नाम नहीं है..
      और साईं ने कहा की सबका मालिक एक – पर वो मालिक एक है कौन?? और साईं सत्चरित्र में कहाँ लिखा है की साईं सबका मालिक एक है कहता था??
      मैं आपको प्रमाण दे रहा हु की साईं केवल अल्लाह मालिक कहता था.. अगर वो अल्लाह को मालिक कहता था तो वो सर्वधर्म संभव कैसे हुआ, हजारो निर्दोष हिन्दुओ के हत्यारे इस्लाम को वो क्यों इतनी महत्वता देता था??
      अध्याय तीन और चार पढ़े, अक्ल आ जाएगी आपको..

      • @admin…in our country those who create magic are praised like God…Sai or asharam bapu is one example

      • Brother, sai baba alha malik he bolte the yeh sach he ….. or oha sabka malik ak he oh bi bolte the ….. or agar uniki jibani agar thik se padaha hota to apko ahe pata hota ki sai baba ne kabhi kisi ko unki puja karne ke liye nahi kaha …. unhane shirf ak baat kahi ki sradha and saburi means kisi parbhi srahda rakho oh alha oh bagaban or dharya dharan karo …. or ak bat kahunu aj hindu mata bano … hindustani bano…. or ak bat dusaro ko akal batne se pahele khud apne dil main jhanko ….. or… logono apne sradha or biswas ke sahare jine do…..

      • सही कहा मित्र आपने, एक हम ही मुर्ख है, बाकी सब समझदार है, साईं सत्चरित्र में से आप कही भी ये श्रधा सबुरी वाले दो शब्द ढूंढ कर दे दीजिये, साईं का प्रचार शुरू कर देंगे और उसके भक्त बन जायेंगे,
        और मित्र जब तक हिन्दू है तब तक हिन्दुस्थान है,
        और ये पाकिस्तान भी अपना ही भाग था, हिन्दू घटा तो देश बंटा,,,
        इतनी सी बात आप लोगो को समझ नहीं आती फिर कहते हो की कोई कुछ नहीं करता, और जो करता है उसे आप जैसे शास्त्रहीन व्यक्ति समझाने आ जाते है जबकि आप खुद ही नहीं समझते,,,

      • why you want to prove that others castes are wrong and how much you are correct..

        Doesn’t matter if one is consuming tobacco or anything, (and evenly tobacco was not declared as cancer causing agent or anything else due to unaware programms) He was supporter of poors, doesn’t matter hindu or muslim,

        for your reference
        http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/features/thrill-of-the-chaste-the-truth-about-gandhis-sex-life-1937411.html

        then M. Gandhi is supecious.. but doesn’t matter, he fighted for common peoples (unlike you, making common peoples fight on wrong things) and for your keen knowledge He have consumed non veg food and beers too

        first of all tell me why there’s need of malik or lords , when niether talking about him or praising him is not going to decrease the hike in prices nor common peoples issues,

        and I see such blogs making humans (especially poors) from both the sides to fight, and the ultimate winner is the majority .. crude politics.

        like this, why don’t you guys do research on hike in prices, unemployment or the very common issues, that will definately lead to a sustainable society.

        see bro, i don’t know who you are, and what you do.. but cause of the posts and blogs like this nobody else but only common peoples are hearted. and the things you are telling here can also be told from that side..

    • if sai is “साक्षात् इश्वर” then y did he said sabka maalik ek. who is that “maalik” ?

    • Kahte Hain Ki Sai Ko Bhagwan Na Kahen || कहते हैं की साईं को भगवान न कहें Khate hai ki SAI ko bhagwan Na kahen
      Shankaracharya ji kahte hain ki sai ko bhagwan na kahe.. woh bhagwan nahi hain.. or unki pooja nahi karni hai.. hamare sanatan dharm ke wirddh hai. Woh kahte hain ki sai ki murtiyan mandir se hata do lekin woh hamare antaryatma.. hamare man hamare dil se sai ko kaise hata sakte hain.. kya ham sai ki pooja band kar sakte hain.. kya ham sai ka murti hata sakte hain. jai. sai…

  2. क्या एक महान पुरुष का, चाहे वो किसी भी जाति, समुदाय, धर्मं का हो, सम्मान योग्य नहीं है? यदि आप कहते हो कि केवल ईश्वर और देवता का ही पूजन सनातन धर्मं कहलाता है तो आप मुनि व्यास, तुलसीदास, वशिष्ठ, विश्वामित्र, सप्त-ऋषि आदि का सम्मान क्यूँ करते हो? एक बात और बताएं, मुझे आपकी बुद्धि पर आपके बौद्धिक-स्तर पर हंसी आती है, सनातन धर्म में सभी देवता हैं, ब्रह्मदेव, इन्द्रदेव, विष्णुदेव, अग्निदेव, वायुदेव, वरुणदेव, अरुणदेव आदि आदि! तो ये देवता हुआ, अर्थात पूजनीय हुए, परन्तु शिव तो देव नहीं?? कहीं सुना है शिव देव? तो उनका पूजन क्यूँ?
    चाहे इस्लाम हो या हिन्दू, चाहे सिख, बौद्ध, जैन, पारसी, ईसाई, एक दिन में नहीं बन गए थे! जैसे कि आपने ये ब्लॉग बना लिया! सम्मान नहीं कर सकते तो अपमान भी न करो!
    जय श्री भैरव नाथ!

    • आपने मुनि व्यास, तुलसीदास, वशिष्ठ, विश्वामित्र, सप्त-ऋषि आदि का उदहारण दिया, इनमे से कितने ऋषियों की मूरत बना कर हम मंदिरों में पुज रहे है, क्या आप इनमे से किसी एक की भी सूरत पहचान सकते है, रही बात शिव जी की तो आप को क्या इतना भी ज्ञान नहीं की वे त्रिदेवो में आते है, देवो के देव है वे, इतना अज्ञानी बनोगे तो पाखंडी तो कहलाओगे ही न,,

      • mujhe nahi malum ke aap kon ho par jo bhi ho magar insaan nahi ho ek kattar muslim ki tarah ek kattar hindu ho aap jese pure hindu aur pure muslmano ki wajah se insaan ki jati is duniya se khatam ho rahi hai kon kehta hai ke koi muslim puja nahi karta har koi puja karta hai par tarike alag alag hain maine khud 5 baar lagatar shri amarnath ki yatra ki hai aur har dharm ki izaat karta hun chahe vo koi bhi ho bhagwan ne koi cheez vearath nahi banayi us ne ek samajdhar insaan banaya tha jo aab dharmo ke chakar mein kho giya hai jab tak aap jese pare likhe log apni soch nahi badlenge to aur kon badlega. agar aap ko kuch bura laga ho to aap se muafi chahta hun…………………….

    • oye sun tera shash kaise hua iski tulana MAHADEV KE SATH KARNI KI. TU HOTA KAUN HAI TERA ASTITWA KYA HAI IS SANSAR MEIN

      MURKH IS SANSAR KI RACHNA MAHADEV NE KI HAI

      VO DEVON KE DEV MAHADEV HAI

      TU PUJ YA MAT PUJ VO MAHADEV HI RAHENGE

      MAHADEV TERKO SADHBUDHI DE.

      HAR HAR MAHADEV.

    • Abe moorakh Mahadev Bhagawan Shiv ji ko hi kaha jata hai…..

  3. Dear Author, I admire your staunch love towards Sanatana Dharma. In today’s situation when people don’t even know the abc of Hinduism, it’s good to see such strong and coherent force of attachment towards religion gushing forth. However, in my humble opinion it looks like this enviornment is becoming filled with more of fanaticism, more of hate speech instead of love for hinduism. I have no comments on your articles on Islam since that is not my field of interest hence I neither have capability to support your opinions nor I can comment on your points. But here on this article on Shirdi Sai I would like to humbly disagree with you if you permit. Allow me to put my two cents, and I request you to read them with an impartial bent of mind keeping your preconceived notions aside for a while. well, neither I am a staunch devotee of Sai nor I am an abuser/hater. Once in a while I do visit his temple in my city and at home, during my usual Puja, alongwith worshiping other gods and goddesses of Hindu pantheon I also do offer my prostrations to Sai. Absolutely, I don’t have any negative impressions about him but at the same time I am not a sai fanatic. so, hopefully you would see logical arguments in my points instead of fanaticism. Well, initially I ignored your post and thought not to comment. But then remembered the below couplet of great wisdom, and then thought let me put my two cents, who knows, it might help you abandon your hatred for Sai? “Nindak niyare rakhiye aangan kuti chhawaye; Bin sabun pani bina nirmal karat subhaye”. “Keep a critic near you in your backyard for he will help you cleanse yourself without soap and water”. ######### THE RESPONSES BEGIN HERE ############## 1. [qUOTE] गीता में भी भगवान श्रीकृष्ण कहते हैं कि भूत प्रेत, मूर्दा (खुला या दफ़नाया हुआ अर्थात् कब्र अथवा समाधि) को सकामभाव से पूजने वाले स्वयं मरने के बाद भूत-प्रेत ही बनते हैं. [UNQUOTE] The actual Gita verse and it’s various meanings are as follows. “yaanti devavrataa devaan pitreenyaanti pitrivrataah | bhutaani yaanti bhutejyaa yaanti madyaajino‘pi maam | (BG: 9.25) “They whose vows are directed to the Pitris attain to the Pitris; who direct (their) worship to the inferior spirits called Bhutas attain to Bhutas; they who worship me, attain even to myself”. Alternatively read the following translation by Swami Sivananda “The worshippers of the gods go to them; to the manes go the ancestor-worshippers; to the Deities who preside over the elements go their worshippers; My devotees come to Me”. So, both the points are correct, Bhutas could be taken as spirits as well as elements. so deities who preside over elements are Agni, vayu etc Vasus. However, never mind this Gita verse; since, in either case, your interpretation of devotees worshiping the ghost of Sai stands incorrect. Shirdi Sai was neither a ghost nor devotees worship his ghost even when they offer ‘chaadar’ to his samadhi. being a Hindu you might be aware of the fact that only Abrahmic religions preach that after death the soul remains inside the tomb and they would resurrect on the final day of judgement. That concept is flawed and Hinduism doesn’t support that idea. Sai’s body was burried (samadhi) but his Atman is all-pervasive. So, the devotees worshipping his tomb in Shirdi is as like as we Hindus worshipping the almighty through Vigrahas (vigraha puja). Going by your logic of Bhagawad Gita, if i am worshipping Shiva-Linga or an idol of Vishnu, I would attain to that stone (linga) or that metal idol (Vishnu) after my death? Did you realize the logical fallacy in your understanding? Please understand that Hindus do NOT worship idols / Samadhi; they worship the all-pervading supreme almighty and these idols and samadhis are just “upAdhI-s” for the sake of “upAsanA”. At the end of the day these idols and Samadhis do not matter, all these devotees are worshipping the almighty in the form of Shirdi Sai baba’s figure. shruti says, ” 2. [QUOTE] लाखो पढ़े लिखे हिंदू एक ऐसे मुस्लिम संत के अंध भक्त होकर पूजते है जिसे हम शिरडी के साईं बाबा के नाम से जानते है| वो संत जो खुद एक मस्जिद में रहता था, सबके सामने कुरान पढता था (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/820/) [UNQUOTE] This is a misconception. Of course he used to stay in a dilapidated mosque. But why don’t you talk about the mosque’s name that he named it? He called that place as “dwArakA mAyI”. Why would a muslim ever name his residence with a Hindu name? Food for thought? Also, your allegation that Sai used to read Quran is also not correct. I haven’t come across any such reference that he used to read Quran. well, even if he used to read, what’s the problem? he used to preach unity in all religions and was an advocate of all gods being same. So, what’s the big deal if he read Quran? Even Ramakrishna Paramahamsa read Quran and followed Roza for some period and he also meditated on jesus as well. What’s the issue that you see in the acts of such saintly personalities? At least we don’t see any issue there. Issue is not in them, it is in the “fanaticism” of your thoughts. It would have been an problem had he been showing disrespect or hatred towards Hindu scriptures while accepting quran as the authority. When such a case was not there, then your allegation stands insignificant. In fact, he used to equally give importance to all religious scriptures. Not only he encouraged Muslims to read Quran but at the same time he encoraged Hindus to read many priceless gems of Hindu scriptures. In fact he was well aquaited with all scriptures of Hinduism also. He adviced his followers to study ‘Ramayan, the Vishnu Sahasranam, the Bhagvad Gita, the Guru Charitra, the Eknathi Bhagwat, the Bhavartha Ramayan, the Harivarda, the Dasbodh, the Dnyaneshwari and the Yoga Vasishtha’. Here are few quotes from the below website for quick reference. http://www.shrisaibabasansthan.org/new_eng%20template_shirdi/shri%20saibaba%20trust/saileela/2011/saileela-english_JANFEB011/page5.htm “Shirdi Sai Baba encouraged His devotees to pray, chant God’s Name, and make Parayan (reading) of Holy Scriptures”. “He pushed the Muslims to study the Holy Qur’an, and the Hindus to study Texts such as the Ramayan, the Vishnu Sahasranam, the Bhagvad Gita, the Guru Charitra, the Eknathi Bhagwat, the Bhavartha Ramayan, the Harivarda, the Dasbodh, the Dnyaneshwari and the Yoga Vasishtha”. “After completing Parayan (reading) of the Harivarada, Kakasaheb Dixit enquired with Baba, “Baba, what shall I read next ? Or, should I continue reading the same book once again ?” Baba replied, “Now read Eknath’s Vrindavana’s Pothi.” Dixit had never heard of any book by that name. So, he got confused to hear this instruction. He felt that Baba might be referring to the Eknathi Bhagwat, and decided to leave it to his Lord Sai Baba to solve this problem. Therefore, he took a copy of Krishnadayarnav Swami’s Harivarada and went to the Dwarkamai-Masjid. Baba scanned through the book and returned it back to Dixit saying – “Yes ! This is the book. Read it !”” “Dixit was still confused as to why Baba called it Vrindavana’s Pothi. It was because the name was more appropriate for Harivarada which narrated various childhood acts of Lord Krishna. As Dixit began reading and suddenly he came to an Ovi which referred to ‘Ektisa Khananche Vrindavan’. This explained the whole matter”. “Baba asked Kakasaheb to go through it (Sant Eknath’s Bhavartha Ramayan). It was the best piece of advice Lord Ram had given to Tara, the widowed queen of the monkey king Bali. This was Baba’s consolation therapy in disguise needed by the grief-stricken Kakasaheb”. “Baba impressed upon Narke, who was a Professor of Earth Science [Geology] in Poona Engineering College, to study at least a small part of the Yoga Vasishtha daily for the purpose of bringing reconciliation of spirituality and science in his thoughts”. “Once, Sai Baba insistently told Shama to read Vishnu Sahasranam, and said, “Oh Shama, this Book is very valuable and efficacious. So, I present it to you; you read it ! Once, I suffered intensely and my heart began to palpitate and my life was in danger. At that critical time, I hugged this Holy Book to my heart, and then, O Shama ! what a relief it gave me ! I thought that Allah Himself came down on the soil of Shirdi and saved me. So, I give this to you; read it slowly, little by little, read daily one Name at least and it will do you good.” (Shri Sai Sat Charita, Chapter 27)” 3. [QUOTE] सिर्फ यही नहीं यह पाखंडी खुद को हिंदू देवी देवताओं का अंश बताता था स्वयं में नारायण, शिव, क्रिशन और राम जैसे हजारों देवी देवताओं के रूप में खुद की पूजा करवाता था पर हिंदू मुस्लिम एकता की बात जरुर करता था| (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/820/) [UNQUOTE] My friend! Aren’t you aware of the teachings of the great Upanishads? Haven’t you heard of the ‘mahAvAkyA-s’? Haven’t you read what vivEka-chUdAmaNI states? Haven’t you understood that Bhagawad Gita also states the same point? let me explain what i mean to say. When someone says “I am Shiva” surface thinkers take it as “that person means to say he is shiva”, but reality that means “I, the self (Atman) is shiva”. Got It? So, not only Sai baba’ statements, but in fact any self-realized gyani can proclaim the same statements about oneself. Even tomorrow if you happen to say that you are brahman, I would not get surprised, because I know what is what. Shiva, Vishnu, You, Me and everything is brahman alone (sarvam khalvidam brahman). That brahman is nothing but the very own self (Atman). And Atman is the supreme entity beyond which there is no god (ayam Atma brahmah). Till the time you and I are under the blanket of Maya, for us Shiva and other gods look superior and we look as mortal beings. For realized yogis, who have had their self realization; they see no difference between them and the paramatman. Therefore it is the brahmajnana (knowledge of the self) which makes a yogi say that he is identical with brahman, he is shiva, rama, krishna etc. Sai baba was a realized saint, he was in fact a great yogi as well, so for such saints there remains no difference between them and God. So, if he said he was shiva that’s true since the same is voiced by Shankara also (shivOhaM shivOhaM), likewise, a self realized yogi is always same as shiva, Vishnu, Devi or any form since he remains identical with Brahman. We have lot many saints who also stated the same. For instance Ashtavakra also stated in his discourse to Janaka that he is the supreme self. Now don’t come up with another “bhanda fod” article on Astavakra muni as well. (hehehe just kidding pls take it easy.) 4. [QUOTE] अल्लाह मालिक शब्द ही इस्लामी सत्ता फैला कर साईं के द्वारा हिन्दुओ को मुर्ख बना कर उन्हें धर्म से डिगाना ये सबसे बड़ा उदहारण है (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/820/) [UNQUOTE] Hahaha, my friend, this shows that your indepth knowledge of Islam (which i appreciated earlier) also couldn’t help you understand god! Let me explain it with my limited knowledge on the same. religions may be different, castes and creeds may be different, languages may differ; however logically it is STUPIDITY to think god of all religions is different. Islam teaches the following: a) “la ilAh illallAh”, which means, “Allah is the only god apart from whom there is nothing”. Do you know where from this statement was derived? Islam is a derivative of Hinduism alone, it might have corrupted some of the hinduism principles but still it retains many of Hindu principes related to God. This statement of Quran has been copied from yajurveda which says “ekO rudrO na dwitIyAya tasthur”, which means, “lord shiva is the only God apart from whom there is no second entity”. b) Islam says “Allah is nirguna nirAkara”. This is again copied from Hinduism where Shiva is the nirguNa nirAkAra brahman in reality and at the vyAvahArika level he also resides as the saguNa brahman c) Islam says, “Allah resides in the seventh heaven”. This is again copied from Hinduism, Shiva actually resides in the seventh heaven viz. Sahasrara chakra within our body in the crown of the head and that is the highest abode of emancipation. d) Islam’s sacred number 786. This is nothing but the symbol of OMKARA. Write 786 in Devanagari script and look at that devanagari number in a mirror. You would see a OM symbol. There are couple of good research papers in internet where from you can learn that Mecca was a shaivite shrine and it used to contain 360 idols of Hindu gods which were later demolished. they also state that in Mecca there are evidences of king Vikramaditya’s rule, and many more evidences of Mecca being a Shaivite temple shrine. Conclusion:- Allah is none other than lord shiva. So, if Shiridi Sai baba says “Allah Malik hai” it directly means “shiva maalik hai (Shiva is the lord)”. Therefore instead of misinterpretting his statement as a tool to spead Islam, better is to understand that Allah is anotehr name of Shiva. Hope this clarifies! 5. [QUOTE] साईं की ये असली फोटो देखिये, क्या इस फोटो में ये हिन्दू लगता है और क्या ऐसा लगता है की इसके अन्दर ऐसी कोई ताकत है जिससे ये लोगो के दुःख दूर कर सकता है. (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/820/) [UNQUOTE] What’s there in appearance? Hindus are NOT hindus based on apeparance. It’s the divine lifestyle as prescribed in the scriptures which makes a person Hindu. Self-knowledge cannot be measured on the scale of leanliness, attire, looks, language, eating habits and lifestyle. It requires a pair of divine eyes and a vision to discern the divinity present behind the facade. Even Ramana Maharshi and Ramakrishna Paramahamsa look like rickshaw pullers or coolies; does that make you call them with such adjectives? No! Because finally what matters is the knowledge what they have within themselves. The same logic applies on Shiridi Baba also. On a side note – Yoga shikha Upanishad says clearly that a self realized yogi who has gained some divine powers, should not boast on his knowledge or display his yogic powers to all in public, he should live a life like a shabby looking mad man, or a beggar. conclusion: Your allegation on Sai based on his looks and attire is baseless and amateurish. 6. [QUOTE] ऐसी हजारो साईटस है जो साईं के चमत्कारों का प्रचार करती है जो पूरी तरह से झूठ और फरेब है (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/820/) [UNQUOTE] Why should anyone believe in your words? What’s the research or evidence behind you calling Sai’s miracles as bogus? Do we have any experimental results carried in some physics / chemistry labs which can falsify his mracles and make the bogus? He lit lamps with water instead of oil, he showed ganga-Yamuna triveNI sangamam by issuing water from his feet. He ignited akhanda-jyoti flame by hitting his tongs on the eath. He saved a baby from fire from a remote location by inserting his hands in fire at his home (shows omnipresence). He used to display ‘khanDa yOga’ by removing out his internal organs and drying them. He cured leprosy instantly, he cured cholera of the entire town. Anybody can easily understand that a normal black-magician or a fake illusionist cannot do these feats. Apart from them many sai devotees have many personal experiences of miracles even after sai left this world. Personal miracles cannot be proved to you and to me, but they can ONLy be experience by the respective person. You cannot say all the mirales that Sai exhibitted were “jhoot and farEb” (false and illusioanry tricks). To make any such statement you need concrete proofs to uncover him. If someone says Satya sai Baba’s miracles were falsified by PC Sarkar, I would agree, but Shiridi sai’s miracles were NEVER challenged by anyone during his time. You think all the Indians were duffers those days? Weren’t there you kind of intellectuals those days? Allegations wouldn’t carry any weightage unless they are proved. Conclusion: there is no proper evidence to falsify Sai’s miracles, hence these allegations stand overruled. 7. [QUOTE] लेकिन अधिकतर हिंदू साईं को एक अवतार और देवीय वरदान मान कर उसकी उसी तरह पूजा करते है जैसे की सनातन संस्कृति में की जाति है जो की पूरी तरह से गलत और सनातन संस्कृति के विरुद्ध है| (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/820/) [UNQUOTE] What do you understand by “SanAtana samskrutI”? Sanatana dharma tells us to see divinity in every plant and every leaf as well. Then what’s wrong in seeing divinity in a shiddha-maha-yogi? His stories tell us that to many of his devotees he displayed forms of many gods within him – to someone he looked like Hanuman, Rama, krishna and even like Jesus to a christian. A god incarnate only can display such forms right? Can you and me do that? Moreover, this itself shows that he believed in unity of all forms of Gods because he didn’t say that he is an incarnation of one particular god. He displayed himself to be one with all the forms o God. that’s the state of self-realization or true godhood. Hindus do NOt worship Sai who was an old, shabby looking unshaven unkempt man. Hindus worship the divinity present within that body. What’s in a body? Bodies perish but the divine atman present within is imperishable. And that’s the divinity which the sai devotees are fond of in him. To worship the almighty you need an upAdhI for upAsana sake. You cannot comprehend the forma dn figure of the divine brahman (Atman) present within everyone. That’s beyond the levels of our cognition. therefore devotees need a photo or an idol for upasana sake. Sai devotees found the presence of the almighty in Sai baba and they bound their devotion with him. So, what’s wrong in worshiping sai baba? You boast about Sanatana Dharma and gods like Krishna, Rama, shiva. How many of them you have really seen? Do you really know whether Vishnu is of BLUE color? Do you know whether it’s true of false that shiva rides on bull and not a harlay-davidson bike? Does Vishnu really ride on garuda or a fighter jet-plane? You cling yourself to those Puranas which depict the god figures in some forms – even though you haven’t personally sighted those Gods and even though you don’t recall your presence in Krishna/Rama’s yugas; still you believe they would look like what have been portyrayed in Puranas; and you can’t accept the same Gods who come in the form of divine saints. This human nature is more uncertain than Heisenberg’s principle. People who lived in Saibaba’s lifetime, witnessed many divine miracles in him and they personally witnessed the presence of divinity in him and then became his follwers and also advocated / propagated that devotion to future also. If you can’t believe in the stories of god-presence in humans from recent decades; then how can you claim to be a believer of Hindu puranas which nobody is alive to stand as eye-witness? Conclusion: allegations without proper analysis have no basis to stand as truths. 8. [QUOTE] कुछ मुर्ख लोगो ने हनुमान स्तुति और दुर्गा चालीसा की तर्ज पर साईं के नाम से साईं आरती और भजन संध्या जैसे जाने कितने ग्रन्थ लिख कर सनातन धर्म की प्राचीन प्रतिष्ठा को आघात पंहुचा कर हिन्दू धर्म को ही दूषित करने से बाज नहीं आ रहे है सनातन धर्म केवल वेड, पुराणों उपनिषदों और शास्त्रों पर आधारित है (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/820/) [UNQUOTE] You are very funny, my friend! You say sanatana Dharma is based on Vedas, Puranas, Upanishads, and shastras. And you also consider Hanuman chalisa as a valid hymn. How? Going by your logic, not only Hanuman chalisa, but all kinds of Chalisas are of later origin. show me their presence in any Purana or Upanishad or Veda please? If your logic needs to be followed then we will be left with only very few uncomprehendable hymns. Most of the hymns that we recite today are composed by Adi shankara who came in early kaliyuga. so, all such hymns also needs to be discarded as bogus if I need to follow your logic, right? Tulasidas Ramayana is also NOT present in vedas, puranas, Upanishads, Valmiki Ramayana and Mahabharata. So, let’s discard that also since it was composed by mere a Rama-bhakta and not by Valmiki or Vyasa. (Ah. don’t tell me Tulasidas was an incarnation of Valmiki and stuff…That’s also a belief as like as shirdi sai being the incarnation of Dattatreya). In fact, the Puranas what we have, they also are largely interpolated now. Well, hymns and poems are just the tools to keep your unrestrainable mind focussed on the form of god of your choise and they are also for expressing our devotion or love for the chosen form of god. So, even if tomorrow a sai devotee composes his own hymn on sai, that is also worth reciting by others who like it. if it was true that only Vedic hymns need to be recited for gods, then most of the non-vedic people who don’t know Vedic intonations would get deprived of god-worship because Vedic hymns needs to be chanted in a particular defined style and not otherwise. Conclusion:- Again your point stands baseless and arguement is amateurish. 9. [QUOTE] असल में साईं एक इस्लामिक बुद्धि का व्यक्ति और और अल्लाह का एक सिपाही है जिसका काम मुर्ख हिन्दुओ को अपने जाल में फस कर इस्लामिक सत्ता कायम करना है (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/820/) [UNQUOTE] I have read this statement numerous palces in your articles. But it doesn’t have any evidence to back for. How many cases do we have in history that Sai converted his Hindu devotes to islam? He always shown the path of living peacefully with other religious people. conclusioN: – False allegations are bad and reflect dishonesty of the mind 10. [QUOTE] साईं के असली नाम और उसके जनम को लेकर बहुत सी कथाये और कहानिया है यहाँ तक साईं नाम भी शिर्डी हेमाडपंत द्वारा श्री साईं सत्चरित्र में दिया गया है पर ये व्यक्ति कौन है और उसने ये किताब क्यों लिखी इसका आज तक कोई प्रमाण नहीं है और इस किताब का भी कोई एतिहासिक प्रमाण नहीं है की ये किसी हिन्दू द्वारा रचित है (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/820/) [UNQUOTE] if we go by your logic then Rama’s name and Rama’s story has been coined by valmiki. Krishna was also a charecter created by Vyasa. neither we have any traces of Valmiki nor of Vyasa today. so, should we assume these authors and their creation of charecters viz Rama and Krishna also as false? Religion or spirituality has two pillars on which it is suppored – faith and devotion. The moment you remove faith and start looking at them with doubtful eyes; devotion would automatically vanish and the scriptures would become bogus. On similar lines, if it is recorded in books that Hemadpanth or anyone narrated their personal experiences of divinity in sai, you have only two choices – eitehr believe and attach devotion with Sai or dont believe and stay calm. But without any proper research it’s a sin to hurt the feelings of the believers. Conclusion:- If sai baba’s life has no proper evidences to trace when he himself was of recent history; then on same lines we can alsoc all our ancient scriptures and their authors a bogus. 11. [QUOTE] संत वही होता है जो लोगो को भगवान से जोड़े , संत वो होता है जो जनता को भक्तिमार्ग की और ले जाये , संत वो होता है जो समाज मे व्याप्त बुराइयों को दूर करने के लिए पहल करे (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] Now, you would define the boundaries of a Saint, ah? Saints, and self realized yogis have no boundaries. Boundaries itself make one bound. Having no boundaries is itself liberation. Understanding that ‘I am ever liberated’ is what is called as Moksha as per Vedanta. Well, where does Sai not fit in your definition? Did Sai not connect the devotees with God? (He showed presence of God within himself). Didn’t Sai take devotees towards devotion? Didn’t Sai eradicate the ills of the society? (He eradicated epidemic cholera, he erdicated the hatred of among religions and made Hindu muslim christians united). Conclusion:- A saint is beyond your definitions of sainthood but still Sai fits well in your definition also. Therefore there is nothing to complain here. 12. [QUOTE] इस साई नाम के मुस्लिम पाखंडी फकीर ने जीवन भर तुम्हारे राम या कृष्ण का नाम तक नहीं लिया , और तुम इस साई की काल्पनिक महिमा की कहानियो को पढ़ के इसे भगवान मान रहे हो (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] He was not a devotee like normal babas. He was a self realized yogi hence a representative of the God himself. Realized yogis and god incarnates need not do name chanting of Rama and Krishna. Japa is a Karma and is bound to bind you in fruitition. A liberated Jiva or an incarnation need not bind himself with such karmas, however that stands optional for them. Sai showed Rama and Krishna to his devotees within his own self, so why does he need to chant their names? How can you define his mahimA as kAlpanik (imaginary)? Neither you nor I have seen him or judged him with first hand information. Therefore whatever evidences we have in documented or oral format, we have no choice other than accepting that as real. If you say his deeds were all imaginary, then it has to be substantiated with evidences whih cannot be shown. So, why to throw blames on him? 13. [QUOTE] कितनी भयावह मूर्खता है ये ….महान ज्ञानी ऋषि मुनियो के वंशज आज इतने मूर्ख और कलुषित बुद्धि के हो गए है कि उन्हे भगवान और एक साधारण से मुस्लिम फकीर में फर्क नहीं आता ? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] Again this point makes me laugh. How shallow your understanding of Hinduism is, is being reflected through your words. Our scriptures advocate us to see no difference between God and a dog, between a king and a chandala. A real gyanI is that person who really sees no difference between God and a human. And I am happy to know that based on your analysis the [so called] filthy minded devotees have got uplifted to that high spiritual vision that they don’t see differences between God and this Muslim fakIr. That state of vision is the one which would give them emancipation. Great!! 14. [QUOTE] जब आज तक कभी कोई मुस्लिम तुम्हारे शिव जी की शिवलिंग पर दूध या जल चढ़ाने नहीं आया , कभी तुम्हारे हनुमान जी की मूर्ति पर सिंदूर चढ़ाने नहीं आया , कभी तुम्हारे विष्णु जी पर तुलसी-दल या असंख्यों मंदिरो में स्थापित मूर्तियो पर पुष्प चढ़ाने नहीं आया तो तुम किस मुंह से सडी हुयी लाशों के ऊपर बनी कब्रों,दरगाहों और मजारों पर चादर चढ़ाने पहुच जाते हो ? शरम नहीं आती (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] I think you haven’t heard about Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham. Nearby there is some mosque and legend goes that whenever Muslims take some procession they do circumambulation around the Kamakshi temple and then go forward. In Andhra Pradesh Kandimallaiyya Palle village there is a Mutt of a great saint who authored prophecies which really happened so far. He had a muslim born man as his disciple, its a story of some 600 ears back, legend says that now also the nearby village muslims do visit that saint’s old ashram with faith. haven’t you heard about Sant Kabir Ji whose couplets are very famous and we read in our school hindi books also? Kabir was a Rama devotee. Similarly another muslim born saint Rahim who adopted Krishna as his god and became a krishna devotee he also wrote excellent couplets. From Rahim’s works let me quote here a couplet which should clarify all your doubts about baba. Rahim says, “rahiman is sansaar mein sabse miliye dhaayi na jaane kehi roop mein Narayan mili jaayi”, which means, “O Rahim! Go run and meet everyone in this world with affection, because you never know in which form you would find Narayana himself”. Shirdi Sai devotees found their Narayana in him. For your eyes, Maya has blocked the divine vision hennce you are seeing only a muslim fakir in him. Our Narayana is not in some distant abode vaikuntha rather shruti says, “antar bahir cha sarvaM nArAyaNa sthitaH”, which means, “Narayana is present within and without everywhere”. However, unfortunately only few discern him! 15. [QUOTE] वो तुम्हारे भगवान को गालिया देते है , निंदा करते है , और दिन मे एक दो नहीं पाँच पाँच बार मस्जिद से साफ साफ चिल्लाते है कि एकमात्र ईश्वर अल्लाह है और कोई है ही नहीं … तो तुम्हें सुनाई नहीं देता क्या ये (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] This is the root of the hatred-disease what you are suffering from. It is Muslims who abuse Hinduism, true, agreed. But then you are already taking revenge with them through your anti-islamic articles, no? Please continue that. Why do you want to project your hatred for muslims on Sai baba just because his attire looks like Muslim? Yes, I hear them praying alound saying “Allah is the only God and none exists apart from him”; I don’t have any problem with that statement because they are telling the truth about lord Shiva in their language. As simple as that! refer to Point #4 above for details. 16. [QUOTE] या फिर तुम्हारी ऐसी कौन सी इच्छा है जो कि हमारे परमकृपालु, दयालु ,भक्तवत्सल भगवान पूरी कर ही नहीं सकते , उसे या तो सड़े हुये मुर्दे की हड्डिया पूरा कर सकती है , या फिर शिरडी मे जन्मा एक मुस्लिम फकीर साई आखिर जाते क्यो हो? जब तुम्हारी प्यास भगवान रूपी ,गंगाजल से नहीं बुझ रही , तो दरगाह और साई रूपी कुए के पानी से कैसे बुझ जाएगी ? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] see, the problem is, you are not able to see the 360 degree picture of devotion. In Mahaharata sri Krihna was himself the Guru (as gItAchAryA) and also identified himself with the brahman and became the target object of Gita as well. Without a Guru how can you know the unmanifest infinite reality? So, god is believed to ahve come as Sai baba in the form of a Guru. The same Sai is believed to have shown his supreme Godly forms to the deserving devotees. That way he himself remained as Guru and himself revealed that he is the target of their devotion (as God) himself. So, there are people who worship as God and others who worship him as Guru. But in either case he can be ranked as supreme because God is always supreme and Guru is also identical with God. You would have heard about “guru sAksHAt paraM brahma tasmay srI guravE namaH”, which means, “Guru is verily the parabrahman therefore prostratins to be to the Guru who is such”. In Sri Vidya tradition it is said that within our body which is a microcosm, there remains a mandala called ‘guru-mandala’, where the supreme goddess lalitamika herself remains in the form of our Guru (gururUpiNi). So, a Guru is always identical to the brahman. Hence whether Sai devotees worship him as Guru or as God, it doesn’t matter in either case Guru is same as God. As already explained in Point #1, people do NOT worship his bones, and his samadhi. They visit shirdi just for the sake of upAsanA. Sai would hear their prayers even if they pray from within their homes. conclusion:- You are not clear about the devotion of Sai devotees, your understanding is vague about Guru and God. So, this allegation remains falsified. 17. [QUOTE] गीता में श्री कृष्ण भगवान जी ने साफ साफ कहा है कि जो जिसे पूजता है वो उसे ही प्राप्त होता है … यानि मरे हुये व्यक्तियों को सकाम भाव से पूजने वाला पिशाच योनि को प्राप्त होता है … ये स्वयं श्री कृष्ण ने कहा , तो भी इन मूर्खो मे इतनी भी बुद्धि नहीं बची कि समझ जाये कि साई को पूजने वाले ,मृत्युपर्यंत पिशाच बनकर ही भटकेंगे (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] Your understanding is very much flawed on the Gita verse. If you worship Rakshasas and Pishachas you would go to their abode. But here Sai devotees do NOT worship sai’s bones or corpse. They worship sai-rupENa-Atman. They worship the divinity in sai and not any ghosts. Moreover, to go to a ghosts abode that ghost needs to be a ghost right? Who told you that Sai became a Ghost? Even if for the time being I assume that he was not a god, then also he was a self realized Yogi. And such saints have their bonds of transmigration automatically cutoff and after leaving their body they become one with brahman (vidEha muktI). Therefore Sai cannot remain as a ghost in any ghost-abodes. so, a devotee who prays to Sai (who has become one with brahman), would go to emancipation only. conclusion: – Your logic is as like as equivalent of saying that since krishna is bodily not present on earth, people who worship krishna’s photo frames would become a frame after death. Funny way of Gita interpretation reflects in your logic. 18. [QUOTE] साई ने ऐसा क्या कर दिया था जो कि तुम्हारा गला नहीं दुखता उसकी महिमा गाते गाते ?अरे पूरा भारत उस समय अंग्रेज़ो के डंडे खा रहा था , साई ने बचाया था क्या ? अगर वो भगवान था या संत था तो उसने गुलामी की बेड़ियो में जकड़ी भारत माता को स्वतन्त्रता दिलाने के लिए क्या किया था?उस समय श्री कृष्ण की प्रिय सर्वदेवमई गोमाताए काटी जाती थी उनके ऊपर साई कभी क्यो नहीं बोला? भगवान श्री कृष्ण थे , जब कंस के अनुचर गोमाताओ को ले जाने लगे तो , मार कर परलोग पाहुचा दिया था और एक ये साई था कि हजारो गोमाताए रोज कटती रही ये बचाना तो दूर उनके ऊपर कभी बोला तक नहीं ? काहे का भगवान या संत था ये ? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] dude! You must note it carefully that every god incarnation has some purpose. Whatever Krishna’s form of Vishnu was supposed to do, he did with that form. Had Vishnu took the form of Rama or Krishna for killing Hiranyakashyap, he would have failed to kill him because of the respect for Brahma’s boons. Similarly Mahabharata war required a lot of strategic thinking for which Krishna’s brain was needed, there Narasimha’s anger wouldn’t have helped in all the cases. Likewise, considering Sai as Dattatreya’s avatara, his form is for bestowing the knwledge of unity among all religions and to spread brotherhood. He didn’t come as a freedom fighter. His motto was to harmonize all religions and bring them on a common platform. You can’t expect a truck driver to drive an aeroplane even though both tasks require a human to steer the vehicle ahead. Similarly you cannot expect Gandhi, Azad, Bhagat Singh etc. men to go about preaching Hinduism and to uphold dharma. Everyone has their one role to play here. Even Vivekananda was probably a contemporary of Sai baba, so would you expose him also for not having fought for freedom and having spent his time in just spreading vedantic awareness? I am not sure how tru it is, but some people say that in his books Vivekananda wrote that he used to eat beef. if that is correct then first thing eating meat is itself against sanyAsa-dharma, and eating beef is beyond my imagination. So, every incarnation works under certain boundaries. They cannot work as per the rules laid by you or to please you. period! Conclusion: In Sringeri Peethadhipati Bharati-Tirtha-Swami’s words if i have to conclude, “You cannot compare one saint’s works with another saint’s. everyone remains unique in their style and field and hence everyone deserves their own share of respect”. Hope you would have got the message and understood the gap in your thoughts. 19. [QUOTE] क्या इस भूमि की सनातनी संताने इतनी बुद्धिहीन हो गयी है कि जिसकी भी काल्पनिक महिमा के गपोड़े सुन ले उसी को भगवान और महान मानकर भेडॉ की तरह उसके पीछे चल देती है ? इसमे हमारा नहीं आपका ही फायदा है …. श्रद्धा और अंधश्रद्धा में फर्क होता है, श्रद्धालु बनो …. भगवान को चुनो , राम और कृष्ण के बनो …. साई के बनाकर सिर्फ भूत प्रेत बनाकर ही भटकोगे ….. जय श्री राम कृष्ण ……… जय सनातन धर्म (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] I am not supposed to talk like this, but to explain you the point that Shraddha (faith) is something which we build in a god-figure and through that upAdhI we do upAsana and reach the paramAtma who is beyond all upadhIs; I need to ask you something. You said, hearing some imaginary miracles people are foolishly getting devoted to Sai and you suggested them to devote themselve sto Rama and Krishna. What evidences can you or I put forward to prove that Rama and krishna’ miracles were correct? They could be simple plain kings of high valor, and the writer-poets Vyasa and Valmiki might have glorified their charecters beyond human levels? We don’t have ny firsthand eye-witness living now who would have witnessed Krishna’s divine form. But still we belive our ancient scriptures as correct and worship them? But assume for a while that Rama and krishna were not gods, and all stories including Gita was just a literary masterpiece (just assume). Then today those kings viz. Rama and krishna are dead, and you and me both are worshipping their photos / idols; so going by your logic of Gita verse we both are bound to go to their ghost forms and become a ghost. However, if you see Sai baba’s stories, he was of recent origin, atleast your grand father’s father might have lived contemporary to sai baba. therefore atleast we would have 4th hand information about his miracles and deeds if not the first hand info. But regarding krishna, Rama etc. who know how many hands their stories passed? I’m sorry I am a great believer of scriptures and I can’t even imagine of such things about my scriptures; but this is all an imaginary scene that I’m creating here to explain that when you cannot trust a story of recent origin about Sai, you cannot trust scriptures of ancient rigin either. Now coming to your ten questions: 20 [QUOTE] 1 – साई को अगर ईश्वर मान बैठे हो अथवा ईश्वर का अवतार मान बैठे हो तो क्यो?आप हिन्दू है तो सनातन संस्कृति के किसी भी धर्मग्रंथ में साई महाराज का नाम तक नहीं है।तो धर्मग्रंथो को झूठा साबित करते हुये किस आधार पर साई को भगवान मान लिया ? और धर्मग्रंथ कहते है कि कलयुग में दो अवतार होने है ….एक भगवान बुद्ध का हो चुका दूसरा कल्कि नाम से अंतिम चरण में होगा……. । (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] If you cannot see Sai baba as an incarnation, at least for the time being don’t deny that he was a guru who showed righteousness to many by his unique ways of teaching. he was definitely a great guru a great self-realized yogi of par excellence. Now, you CANNOT expect all futuristic divine personalities names to be recorded in Puranas. Going by your logic, can you show me the names of swami Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, ramana Maharshi, mahayogi-Babaji, Tiru-Gyana-Sambandar, 63 Nayannars (saivite saints), Alwars (vaishnavite saints), Appayya Dikshitar, Bhaskararaya Makhin, Annamacharya, Tyagaraja, Potanna, Namdev, Tukaram, Kabir das, Rahim and etc. ?? All these were either divine Gurus or partial incarnations of the divine power. None of them are rcorded in any purana even not in Bhavishyat Purana. So, going by your logic, you have lot of personalities to apply your “operation – bhaandafod”! Go ahead. Why only Sai baba is your target? Secondly, if your hinduism knowledge is so shallow that Avatars are taken only by Vishnu and none else, then that’s your misconception. Vishnu’s avatars list Buddha and kalki but in kaliyuga many other divinities also took Avatars. e.g, Adi Shankara was Shiva-avatara. Ramanuja was Adi-Sesha, Madhawacharya was vayu, Tiru-Gyana-Sambandar and Ramana Maharshi were Kartikeya etc. Now, let me refute anotehr incorrect understanding of your Hinduism knowledge. Yous aid Vishnu avatars in kaliyuga are two – Buddha and Kalki. But my friend Buddha is definitely an Avatar listed in Vishnu’s 10 incarnations but his original name was ARIHANTA and NOT the SIDDHARTHA who became Goutama-Buddha. Therefore this Buddha who spread anti-vedic religion of Buddhism is NOT an incarnation of Vishnu. Arihanta who was Buddha that incarnation of Vishnu was taken during Tripurasamhara by lord shiva. That form came to persuade the three demons away from Shiva bhakti to make their merits decline. so, in kaliyuga Vishnu has only one primary incarnation viz Kalki. 20 [QUOTE] 2 – अगर साई को संत मानकर पूजा करते हो तो क्यो? क्या जो सिर्फ अच्छा उपदेश दे दे या कुछ चमत्कार दिखा दे वो संत हो जाता है?साई महाराज कभी गोहत्या पर बोले?, साई महाराज ने उस समय उपस्थित कौन सी सामाजिक बुराई को खत्म किया या करने का प्रयास किया?ये तो संत का सबसे बड़ा कर्तव्य होता है ।और फिर संत ही पूजने है तो कमी थी क्या ?फकीर ही मिला ? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] Nobody worship him considering him as saint. Hindus don’t worship saints. they worship saints as Gurus. so, Sai is worshipped as Guru and/or as a god but not just as saint. Now to answer your question “why worship him?”, the answer is sanatana dharma prescribes guru-wroship and seva since Guru is verily parabrahman. In a book of few hundred pages do you expect entire life of anybody can be captured? can you prove that Saibaba never advised people about Gou-Seva? It might not have been captured in his books, but in a lifespan of 20-30 years, even if you teach one good thing a day, then also you would run short of topics. so, it is very unlikely that Saibaba wouldn’t have touched the topic of cow’s greatness and significance of cow-protection. sai tried to eradicate the hatred between religions and made people from all religions stand united. What else could be a greater social activity than that? He wasn’t affected with epidemic cholera, he was happy right? Then what was the need for him to eradicate cholera from the entire village? what was the need for him to take his devotee’s disease on himself during his last days and bestow good health upon him? If you really want to see good in him, you have numerous deeds to know, but when you have closed all doors of your cognition, you would only be left with your pre-conceived-notions. And you asked, why only he (fakIr) was chosen for devotion. I ask you why not he? (Just because you are filled with hatred for muslims, you want everyone to obey and follow your thoughts?) 21. [QUOTE] 3- अगर सिर्फ दूसरों से सुनकर साई के भक्त बन गए हो तो क्यो? क्या अपने धर्मग्रंथो पर या अपने भगवान पर विश्वास नहीं रहा ? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] Hinduism is a very flexible way of lifestyle. It gives enough flexibility to anyone to choose his/her favourite form of God and worship. It is the end result that is important and not the means. people worship the almighty paramatman in the form of sai baba. All their worship go to the original paramatman alone whose form is sai. Who told you that people worship sai becaus ethey lost their faith in Rama, Krishna etc.? They worship Sai alongwith Rama, krishna etc gods. Even if they are particular in sai worship then also why this hue and cry? It’s their chosen form of god and the paramatman would return their prayers from that form only. Gita says, “whosoever worships me in whichever form, I make their faith stronger in that form and address their prayers through that form only; however all these prayers come to me O arjuna”. So, what’s the need of forcing people to worship those forms of god whom no one ahs ever seen and only find them in scriptures? I think you are adopting Islam and it’s way of corceful devotion to one ancient god-figures. Why can’t you see divinity everywhere,when god is all pervading? 22. [QUOTE] 4 – अगर मनोकामना पूर्ति के लिए साई के भक्त बन गए हो तो तुम्हारी कौन सी ऐसी मनोकामना है जो कि भगत्वतसल भगवान शिवजी , या श्री विष्णु जी, या कृष्ण जी, या राम जी पूरी नहीं कर सकते सिर्फ साई ही कर सकता है?तुम्हारी ऐसी कौन सी मनोकामना है जो कि वैष्णो देवी, या हरिद्वार या वृन्दावन, या काशी या बाला जी में शीश झुकाने से पूर्ण नहीं होगी ..वो सिर्फ शिरडी जाकर माथा टेकने से ही पूरी होगी। (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] Again you are living in duality and differences. when there is no difference between sai and hiva, Rama, krishna how does it matter if someone goes to kashi some other goes to Tirupati and someone else goes to Shiridi? Sai is a guru and also a god for these dveotees. And these devotees go to Shiridi purely based on their faith. When their heart is set upon Sai how can they go to Kashi? Again as per the Gita, whatever forms one chooses to worship, the lord strengthens their faith in that forma nd addresses their needs through that form only. So, how does it matter if someone asks for boons in Tirupati or in kashi or in Shiridi when the giver of boons is same almighty paramatman? 23. [QUOTE] 5 – तुम्हारे पूर्वज सुबह और शाम …..श्री राम , या कृष्ण या शिव शिव ही बोलते थे….. फिर तुम क्यो सिर्फ प्रचार को सुनकर ,बुद्धि को भ्रम में डालकर साई साई चिल्लाने लगे हो? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] I think you are not acquainted with Upanishadic knowledge of Vedanta. You are still living at the suface o the ocean not diving to the deepest core. What’s in a name? Valmiki was asked to recite “mara mara” and not “rama Rama”, but “mara mara” when recited it gave the same results as Rama because of the connecting words. Gayatri mantra when recited backwards becomes brahmastra mantra. Every name is a divine sound. vAk (speech) is not any ordinary tool, every letter is potent that;s why elders tell us not to utter any bad words. we might not know but the name SAi also would have some potent bijaksharas. hence the names do not matter, what matters is the intensity of devotion. All forms all names are the names and forms of Shiva (says Upanishad). vAk gets produced from PraNa. prANa is verily brahman. vAk’s vaikhari form is what we speak, but it originates in prANa (brahman) and hence vAk is verily brahman (Chandogya upanishad says). so, whatever speech we utter actually everything is the divine sound of brahman only. If you utter a word with positive intent that becomes a boon / blessing for other, if you utter with malignant thoughts that becomes curse on yourself. Likewise, the name Sai itself has some various emanings that you cna find in sai’s books or websites. Therefore, chanting Sai name is as equal as chanting Rama or krishna. Devotion is important, not chanting. These chanting etc., are prescribe dto tame your mind which runs like horses here and there. When you are able to control your mind, what is the need of chanting any god’s name? You can get easily immersed in your inner self. So, vedantically speaking, chanting, worshipping etc. are all useless activities good for only the beginners and not for advanced spiritual practitioners. 24. [QUOTE] 6 – अगर भगवान कि पूजा करनी है तो इतने प्यारे,दयालु ,कृपालु भगवान है न तुम्हारे पास फिर साई क्यो ? अगर संतो की पुजा करनी है तो साई से महान ,ऋषि मुनि है न ….. साई ही क्यो ? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] It seems you are repeating same questions in different ways. I think you should have got answer to this question from above discussion itself. Anyway, in short, Sai is someone who is known to the mankind, our rishis and munis are only available in scriptures and not known to anyone. Therefore direct presence of a walking saint in near past carries more weightage than investing faith in some scriptural figures. So, peopel get attracted towards the god-men who demosntrate good activities, self-knowledge, and miracles. 25. [QUOTE] 7 -मुस्लिम अपने धर्म के पक्के होते है ……अल्लाह के अलावा किसी और की और मुंह भी नहीं करते …..जब कोई अपना बाप नहीं बदल सकता ….अथवा अपने बाप कि जगह पर किसी और को नहीं देख सकता तो तुम साई को अपने भगवान कि जगह पर देखकर क्यो दुखी या क्रोधित नहीं होते ???? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] I already understood what disease you are suffering from. Your problem is hatred for islam which you are applying on fellow hindus. Islam prescribes ONLy one god. Hinduism also prescribes only one god but it gives the flexibility to worship the same god in whatever form of our choice. Even if you want you can worship a cow in fact. When we see divinity in a pig and worship it as Varaha-swami, we see divinity in fish and worship it as Matsyavatara, why can’t people worship sai baba when people see and hear about his divinity? remember that Hinduism is not a tyranny. It is a democracy. Here everyone is free to follow their own mind to reach their own desired destination in spirituality. You cannot force anyone to follow a path preferred by yourself. The problem is that you are combining the principles of islam in Hinduism. Get yourself out of that attitude. 26. [qUOTE] 8 -अगर सनातन धर्मी हो तो सनातन धर्म में तो काही साई है ही नहीं ….. तो आप खुद को सनातन धर्मी कहलाना पसंद करोगे या धर्मनिरपेक्षी साई भक्त ???? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] O God! Give him some knowledge. My friend. you utter too much the word “sanatana dharma”, do you even udnerstand what it means? It translates to “eternal righteousness”, or “eternal religion”. The word eternal cannot be closed ended at one side. so, This religion not only extends till infinity in the past, but also spreaads till infinity in the future. Therefore, whatever no. of sadgurus or divine incarnations woud come in future, all are part and parcel of sanatana dharma alone. so, saibaba’s worship is also a part of sanatana dharma. if not, then tomorrow you cannot worship kali, becaus ehe is a future incarnation who is only mentioned for name sake in Puranas but not seen in reality; and no body in past yugas ever worshipped him, so you should not worship him when he comes. This is what your logic would conclude for him! 27. [QUOTE] 9 – आप खुद को राम या कृष्ण या शिव भक्त कहलाने में कम गौरव महसूस करते है क्या जो साई भक्त होने का बिल्ला टाँगे फिरते हो …. क्या राम और कृष्ण से प्रेम का क्षय हो गया है …. ? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] I think your so called 10 questions are NOT 10 uestions, you are askings ame question in many ways. By this time in above replies you would have found answer to this question but in summary, nobody discards Shiva, rama, krishna worship and aopts saibaba. Everyone worships sai as anotehr form of Rama, krishna or shiva. That’s how sairam, Saikrishna etc. names of baba have come. I haven’t seen anyone till date whos ays I am just a sai devotee, i don’t believe in rama, krihna etc. And I m sure even you would not see such a case anywhere. God is one, people realize him in various forms, here they see god in sai’s form. That’s it. 28. [QUOTE] 10 – ॐ साई राम ……..ॐ हमेशा मंत्रो से पहले ही लगाया जाता है अथवा ईश्वर के नाम से पहले …..साई के नाम के पहले ॐ लगाने का अधिकार कहा से पाया? जय साई राम ………. श्री मे शक्ति माता निहित है ….श्री शक्तिरूपेण शब्द है ……. जो कि अक्सर भगवान जी के नाम के साथ संयुक्त किया जाता है ……. तो जय श्री राम में से …..श्री तत्व को हटाकर ……साई लिख देने में तुम्हें गौरव महसूस होना चाहिए या शर्म आनी चाहिये? (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] People who would have coined these mantras, definitely they would have taken all such rules into consideration. It’s not that india has no experts in mantra-shastra till date that they didn’t notice flaws and you are the saviour of the world today who came to correct these. If Sri can only be applied in front of lord’s names, then why do people address humans by prefixinh sri like “sri haridas ji” etc? Do you know that sri ahs lot many menaings, like beauty, potency etc.? And in reality Sri is originally the name of lalita tripurasundari devi and not of lakshmi devi. Lakshmi inherits that name because she is a form of lalitambika manifested from her shriyam potency. so, if I go by your logic, then sri being lalita herself, that word should be reserved ONLy for lord shiva’s names (shiva being her consort) why is that prefixed with rama and krishna? Answer could be – because sri has also manfested as lakshmi hence it’s her name also. Then why is it seen in names like “sri saraswati”, “sri ganesha”, “Sri kartikeya” and even “Sri Vedavyasa”. etc? Because sri is ‘adara-soochaka-shabda’ (respect giving word) and hence can be used with anyone. And in the case of Sai baba, he is considered as a form of same Rama, Krishna shiva etc. hence his name is prefixed with Sri. Absolutely no issues there! 29. [QUOTE] परित्राणाय साधूनां विनाशाय च दुष्कृताम । धर्मसंस्थापनार्थाय सम्भवामि यूगे यूगे ॥ श्री कृष्ण जी द्वारा कहे गए इस श्लोक के आधार पर देखते है कि साई कितने पानी में है — (https://hindurashtra.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/shirdi-sai-baba/) [UNQUOTE] Not all incarnations happen for the killing of unrighteousness. Not all incarnatios belong to Vishnu either. Did Ramakrishna Paramahamsa ever kill even any ant? But he transformed many live sthrough divine nowledge. Same is teh case with ramana maharshi. same is the case with adi shankaracharya, Ramanujacharya and many more. so, in such categoris of incarnation comes shirdi sai baba. if you see, how many sinner did lord dattatreya kill? he was also an incarnation of Vishnu right? He came only to impart knowledge and even though he is shown as holding weapons, there is not much information in scriptures stating he killed someone. So, going by your logic he cannot becalled as an incarnation. Similarly, KURMA (tortoise) form was also not assumed for killing some sinners and also Kurma didn’t establish any sort of dhanra is just remained as a platform supporting the mountain for churning, there also the rule of Bhagawad Gits stands defied. Similarly, Vamana established righteousness but didn’t kill any sinner. Likewise many avataras exist which either don’t completely fit into Gita vakya nor they totally abide by that rule. so, your arguement stands refuted. #############RESPONCES END HERE ################### well, lastly I would like to leave this page by saying that if you don’t follow sai baba, then you are free not to follow. why do you want to hurt others who follow him? Your attempts in neutralizing Islam’s attacks on Hinduism are good but i don’t see any value add in Sai’s refutation by you. It will not change the devotion of sai devotees. It’ll only enrage them against you. secondly, you are wasting lot of your precious time in these useless researches rather than spending the same valudable time in your self realization and your spiritual upliftment. Human birth is very rare, buddy, please don’t waste your time in these useless debates. I know my replies won’t change you and your thinking, but if at all, you happen to abandon your hatred for Saibaba, then that would itself be a miracle for me. ———————————— Hara hara mahadev | jai Bhavani|

    • आपके इतने संक्षिप्त विवरण में उत्तर के लिए धन्यवाद, आपको समझाना मेरी बुद्धि से परे है, इतने प्रमाणों को नकार कर भी आप साईं को जबरदस्ती इश्वर घोषित करने की कुचेष्टा कर रहे है, जब आप जैसे सज्जन व् विद्वान ऐसा कार्य करेंगे तो आम जनमानस में तो पाखंड फैलेगा ही, साईं के नाम पर व्यापार करके धन कमाना ही आज कल का फैशन बन गया है, ये आपको यदि समझ आता तो क्या कहने, अब आगे के प्रमाणों के लिए तैयार रहे, जल्दी ही और प्रमाण सामने आएंगे

    • Dear Mr. Santosh,

      Excellent writing… Kudos to you…It shows the deepness in your studies…

      नीतिसार से…..
      विद्वानेव विजानाति विद्वज्जनपरिश्रमम् |
      न हि वन्ध्या विजानाति गुर्वीं प्रसववेदनां || – नीतिसार

      विद्वान् ही विद्वान लोगों की मेहनत को जानता है | (जैसे) वन्ध्या स्त्री (जिसके बच्चे न हों) गर्भवती स्त्री की प्रसव वेदना को नहीं जानती |

      I feel this blog is mainted just to spread nonsense without study much. Do chaar kitab padh kar gyani hona ise hi kahte hain. aap is blog admin se bahas main ya logic main nahi jeet sakte….

      Ye to parambuddhiman purush hain… inko kya kah sakte hai… sara ved, puran sab inhone hi padha hai baki sab to aivein time waste kar rahe hain….

      Jai ho aise blog admin ki…

  4. आक्रोशित न हों मित्र! भगवान् शिव देवता नहीं हैं! वे देवताओं से भी ऊपर हैं! आदि-पुरुष हैं! देव एक योनि है चौरासी लाख योनियों में से एक योनि! भगवान् शिव इस योनि-चक्र से ऊपर हैं! ब्रह्मा, विष्णु एवं महेश ये त्रिदेव कहे जाते हैं कोई संदेह नहीं इसमें, परन्तु विष्णु भी मनुष्य योनि में अवतरण लेते हैं! ब्रह्मदेव नहीं और शिव भी नहीं! इस मृत्युलोक में शिव से बड़ा कोई नहीं! मेरा अर्थ यही था, वे देवता नहीं हैं, वरन उनसे ऊपर हैं!
    इस संसार में प्रत्येक कण उसी ईश्वर द्वारा सृजित है, गरीब, अमीर, सुंदर, कुरूप, काला, गोरा, हिन्दू, मुस्लिम! सभी के सभी! आपके कैसे टिपण्णी कर सकते हैं तब इस्लाम पर? अगर आप करते हैं तो आपका अर्थ है कि भगवान् से त्रुटी हुई? नहीं मित्र, ईश्वर कभी त्रुटी नहीं करता! शिक्षा, ज्ञान सभी से लेने चाहिए! चाहे हिन्दू हों या मुस्लिम! चाहे सिख चाहे इसाई!

    • मित्र ये कण कण तो इश्वर ने ही बनाया है पर मैंने कब कहा की उसने त्रुटी की है, यदि में किसी पर टिप्पणी करता हु तो इसका अर्थ ये नहीं की उसे बनाने वाले उस इश्वर में त्रुटी की है, अब आप ये बताये की ये अक्षर जो मैं लिख रहा हु ये सभी हिंदी के है पर है तो सब देखने में अलग अलग, अब यदि में कहू की ये सभी अलग अलग है तो क्या इसमें त्रुटी हो गयी, गलती को दिखाना. उसे परखने का अर्थ ये नहीं की बनाने वाले ने गलती की है, अब आपने कहा की शिक्षा, ज्ञान सभी से लेने चाहिए, तो हे सज्जन, क्या आपकी बात मान कर मुझे तालिबान से भी शिक्षा लेनी चाहिए, ओवैसी साहब से भी कुछ शिक्षा ग्रहण करू क्या. अगर मुझे शिक्षा देने की जगह आपने इतिहास से कोई शिक्षा ली होती तो शायद आप मुझे इस प्रकार उपदेश न देते, इतिहास को जानने और उससे सबक न लेने के कारण ही राष्ट्र की ये गति हुई है, जिसमे कुछ कुछ योगदान आप सज्जन लोगो का भी है

    • आपके नये कमेंट को मैंने हटा दिया है क्यूंकि मुझे शंका है की आप वही फेक अकाउंट से है जो कुछ दिन पहले मनोज रतलाम के नाम से आया था, आप लोग कभी सुधरने वाले नहीं और मैं आप लोगो को सबके सामने नंगा करके ही रहूँगा, इसलिए कृपया अपने मुस्लिम रूप में ही आये

    • hindu ko jagna hoga

  5. इसमें कोई दो राय नहीं …. पाखण्ड को बढ़ावा देता, मूर्ख (मुग्ध) आस्थावानों की बुद्धि को कुंद करता तेज़ी से फैलाया जा रहा ‘साईं’ के नाम का मजहब अंधभक्ति में डूबे मूर्तिपूजकों के लिए ही खड़ा किया गया है।

    ‘ईश्वर एक है’ ‘ईश्वर सर्वशक्तिमान है’ जैसी श्रेष्ठ भावना को अपनी विषाक्त मीठी-मीठी टॉफियों पर कवर रूप में लपेटकर हिन्दू धर्म की आड़ में सनातन वैदिक धर्म को समाप्त करने का षड्यंत्र रचा गया है।

    आपके समस्त विचार …. कई छिपे सत्यों से पर्दा हटाते हैं। पहली बार में बहुतेरी बातें चुभती जरूर हैं किन्तु उनपर निष्पक्ष भाव से मनन करने पर वह चुभन समाप्त होने लगती है।

    ऐसे मंदिरों की उपयोगिता आज के समय में इतनी ही है कि मंदिर से बाहर पंगत में बैठे भिखारियों को कुछ-न-कुछ खाने को मिल जाता है। साईं महाराज की दुकानदारी तभी तक है जब तक समाज में भिखारी, विकलांग, असहाय और कमज़ोर लोग हैं। साईँ महाराज के सभी चमत्कार चढ़ावा चढाने वालों के लिए होते हैं।

  6. aap jin vedo ki baat kar rahe hai jisme om shabd k baare me bataya hai, usper vishwas karne ki vajah kya hai

  7. बहुत अच्छी जानकारी है।

  8. Santosh kumar ji bahut kuch likha lekin yeh bhi SAI SATCHARIT se puri tarah prbhavit hain jaise aur log hain.Mr.Dabholkar ne yah kitab likhane ki anumati swayam SAI BABA se unke jeevankal arthat 1918 se pahale le li thi tab unhe isse likhane me itna samay kyon laga ki yah pustak 1929 me prakashit hui.Jis samay wah ye kitab likh rahe the ve swayam Shirdi Sansthan ke “Treasurer” the.Iska matlab hai ki isme likhi hui ek prachar ke rup me thi na ki ek Jeevan Gatha.Satya ko likhane me 10-15 saal nahi lagte,wah to 1 maah me likha ja sakata hai.Kripya apni astha ko kisi juth ke upar barbad na kare.Ishwar tak pahuchna ke raste anek hain lekin satya ka marg hona chahiye.

  9. आओ दोस्तों मै श्रद्धेय गुरुवर श्री शुभ्रम बहल जी का एक शिष्य और इस पेज का एडमिन तुम्हे एक मज़े की बात बताऊं-
    आज कल हमारे बाबा के बारे में टेढ़ी मेढ़ी बातें करने वाले बदनसीब व्यक्ति यदा कदा देखने को मिल जाते हैं। अभी कुछ दिन पूर्व ही पूरा एक पेज साईनाथ के खिलाफ देखने को मिला। ऐसे दुर्भाग्यशाली लोज ज़्यादातर स्वयं को कट्टर हिन्दू बताकर बाबा को मुसलमान कहने का दुस्साहस करते फिर रहे हैं।
    मै ऐसे मूर्खों से कुछ प्रश्न भी पूछना चाहूंगा और इनकी मूढ़बुद्धी को सही करने के लिए कुछ तथ्य भी बताऊंगा-
    1- आज बाबा के पूरे विश्व मे करोड़ों मंदिर हैं ना कि मस्जिद जहाँ पर नित्य श्री विष्णु सहस्त्रनाम, विभिन्न स्तोत्र, हवन, आरती- पूजन आदि नित्य होते रहते हैं। यह सब कुछ बाबा के दरबार में सनातन पद्धति के अनुसार पुजारी गण करते हैं। तो इनकी मुसलमान ऐजेन्ट जैसी दकियानूसी बात का क्या अर्थ है?
    2- शिरडी मे बाबा की समाधी काल सन 1918 से लेकर अबतक चार आरतियाँ जागरण आरती(काकड़ आरती), मध्यान्ह आरती अर्थात भोग आरती, सायंकालीन धूप आरती और शेज आरती संस्कृत के मंत्रोच्चारण और घंटानाद के साथ नियमित होती आ रही है। वहीं बाबा की समाधी जिसमे बाबा का शरीर विश्रांति पा रहा है विद्यमान है। जो लोग बाबा के विरुद्ध असभ्य वाणी का प्रयोग करते हैं स्वयं वहाँ जाकर देखें की कैसे पृथ्वी पर स्वर्ग शिरडी के रूप में उतरा हुआ है। यकीनन वहाँ बाबा के दिव्य दर्शन कर ऐसे लोगों की मानसिक बीमारियां दूर हो जाएंगी।
    3- ऐसे लोग प्राय: यह कहते हैं कि बाबा को भगवान सिद्ध करो तो माने। अरे मूर्खों भगवान सिद्ध करने के लिए नही अनुभव करने के लिए होते हैं। अगर मै इन लोगों से कहूं कि श्री राम अथवा कृष्ण को भगवान सिद्ध करो तो क्या यह कर पाएंगे । तो क्या वे भगवान नही?
    4-इनकी भाषा मे अगर बाबा भगवान नही हैं और इनके देवता भगवान हैं तो फिर इनके भगवान बाबा की प्रतिमा के साथ प्रसन्न क्यूं नजर आते हैं। हर मंदिर मे अन्य देवताओं के साथ बाबा की प्रतिमा लग रही हैं । अरे जब भगवान को समस्या नही है तो फिर यह इंसान क्यूं परेशान हो रहे हैं । इसका अर्थ तो यह हुआ कि भगवान को किसी राजनीति की आवश्यक्ता नही है और यह लोग बाबा के नाम पर अपनी वोटों की राजनीति कर रहे हैं जिसकी परवाह हम भक्त कणभर भी नही करते
    5-क्या कारण है कि बाबा की कीर्ति आसमान तक पहुंच चुकी है। हर धर्म का व्यक्ति आज उनका गुलाम है। सब उन्हे कलयुग का अवतार कहते हैं। किसी ने सत्य कहा है कि सूर्य, चंद्रमा और सत्य को ज्यादा देर तक छुपाया नही जा सकता है। आज इस पेज पर बाबा के लाखों भक्त हैं कल को करोड़ों होंगे। जगह-जगह और नगर-नगर में गुरू जी के साईकथा कार्यक्रम आयोजित हो रहे हैं। अरे हमारे बाबा तो इतने दयालू हैं कि इतने अपराध करने पर भी अगर यह लोग उनकी शरणागति में आ जाएं तो वे कृपालु इन्हे क्षमा कर कृपा ही करेंगे क्यूंकि वही उनका स्वभाव है।
    अगर आप साई भक्त हैं तो शेयर अवश्य करें

  10. चाणक्य सूत्र :-
    १०० बुद्धिमान व्यक्ति के साथ शास्त्रार्थ करने के बजाये एक महामूर्ख से शास्त्रार्थ की चुनौती अस्वीकार करना बुद्धिमता है…
    ———————————————————————————————–
    (महान हिन्दू संत)
    साधू की जात ना पूछी जाये……

  11. are all of you are mad kuch bhi bole ja rahe ho aap log what you think who the hell you are? jisne bhi yeh lekh likha hai use hindu kahlane ka koi adhikar nahi hai joh kisi ke shradha pe kichad uda shakata hai use kisi bhi bhagvan ke bare mai bolne ka koi bhi aadhikar nahi hai . or ha aap kya kahna chahte sai bhagwan nahi hai ti phir sai ko pujhane wale lakho karodo log bewkhuf hai .kabhi shirdi aake dekho phir samajh mai aayenga har sal kai hindutwadi sanghatan yaha kitni dur se paidal aate hai wo jante hai aap log. sirf social networking site pe baithkar kuch bhi anap shanap bakane se satya badalta nahi hai.

  12. Sai ko Baba hi rahne do inhe bhagavan na banaiye aap log, our inhe sai ram, sai krisn kah ke hindu dharm ka apman na kijiye. ye ek ache insan the is bat pe mebhi inhe smman deta hu lekin inki tuln hindu dharm ke bhagavano se ker ke hundu ko nicha mat dikhiye. vese inka nam baki dharmo ke sath Q nahi joda jata he jese sai pegamber jub ki ye khud musalman the our inka nam Mohamad chan tha. our bhi kai dharmo ke sath bhi joda jaskta he jese mahatma sai budh- bodh panth , sai digamber=jain samaj , guru nanke sai kahalsa panth, musa sai= yahudi sumpraday, Sant Isu-sai=isai sumpraday. aap sai ke prachark esa nahi karoge qki aap jante ho ki in sampradayo our pantho ke log Sanatani hinduo ki tarah bhole bhalem murkh our apne dharm ka gyan na rakhane wale nahi hote he. our aap logo ne ager esa kiya to aap logo ki our aap ke sai ki kher nahi hogi fhir

    aaj kuch logo ne sai ko pese kamane ka jariya bna liya he our Sanatni hindu ko todne wale bhi inka sath de rahe he

    sai baba ek Fakir the ek sant charitr veyakti the ache insan the ye me manta hu lekin unhe bhagavan kahne our Sanatani hindu Dharm ke devi devtao se jodne ka kater virodhi hu

  13. तुम लोग साईं बाबा के बारे में दुष्प्रचार करके किसी को मुर्ख नहीं बना सकते हाँ अपने आप में खुश जरुर हो सकते हो तो होते रहो ..

    साईं सद्चरित्र के अध्यायों के बीच बीच में से लाइने उठाकर उनका अर्थ निकाल रहे हो … बच्चे हो तुम लोग .. अगर उसी लाइन का पूरा पैराग्राफ पढोगे तो सही अर्थ मालुम होगा तुम लोगो को ..

    साईं बाबा का और अपमान अब सहन नहीं किया जाएगा ..

    https://www.facebook.com/exposeantisai

    ( हिम्मत है तो मेरे कमेन्ट को अप्रूव कर देना ) और अगर नहीं किया तो हम समझेंगे कि तुम लोग कायर हो )

    • महाशय आप जिस पेज को यहाँ प्रोमोट कर रहे है उस पेज से तो आपने हमे हटा ही दिया, यदि आप साईं के विरुद्ध किये गये प्रश्नों का सामना कर सकते है तो हमे ब्लॉक क्यों किया,
      हटाये हमे ब्लाक लिस्ट से और करे आमने सामने शास्त्रार्थ,

    • Tum Hindu k naam par kalank ho.

  14. साईं विरोधियों की असलियत हमने दुनिया के सामने ला दी है, लोग समझ चुके हैं कि साईं बाबा का विरोध झूठे और बचकाने तर्कों के आधार पर किया जा रहा है, जितने भी तर्क आप लोग साईं बाबा के विरोध में दे रहे हो वो सभी काटे जा चुके हैं ..और साईं बाबा के विरोधियों का पर्दाफाश भी लगातार हो रहा है .. अब यह पर्दाफाश फेसबुक के साथ साथ वेबसाइट के माध्यम से भी शुरू कर दिया गया है .. साईं विरोधियों के एक एक कुतर्क को काटकर फेंक दिया गया है और यह कार्य लगातार जारी है …

    http://exposeantisai.blogspot.com

    • महाशय कौन से तर्क,, आपके तर्क देखे है, पर उत्तर आप देते नहीं, ब्लाक वैसे ही किया हुआ है, क्या गारंटी है की आप अपने ब्लॉग पर भी कुछ शास्त्रार्थ करने देंगे, कभी कभी लगता है की आप पर साईं द्वारा छोड़ा गया अल-तकिया का बाण सबसे घातक प्रहार कर गया है, इसलिए आपको केवल साईं के अतिरिक्त कुछ समझ नहीं आता,

  15. अगर फेसबुक के पेज पर शालीनता से चर्चा करने का आश्वासन देते हैं तो मैं सभी को अनुमति दे सकता हूँ एक सार्थक चर्चा के लिए ..पर अपशब्द बिलकुल भी सहन नहीं किये जायेंगे…

    • हमने किस शालीनता का उल्लंघन किया है महाशय,
      आप हमारे ब्लॉग को ही देख लीजिये, किसी प्रकार की अभद्र टिप्पणियों को हम नहीं दिखाते पर यदि आप शालीनता से बात करे, फिर चाहे वो हमारे विरोध में ही क्यों न हो, हम उसे दिखाते है,,,

  16. om shri sai ram ……. mahoday aapse nivedan hai ki ek bar
    SHRIPAD SHRIVALLABH CHARITRAMRUT jo ki trimurti bhagwan dattatraya ke pratham avtar SHRIPAD SHRIVALLABH SWAMI ka jivan charitra hai uske last ke 5-6 adhyay jarur padhe aur mai aapke dwara mere SAI ke liye ki gai abhadra tippanni aur asansadiy bhasha ka kada virodh karta hoon aur yah bhasha padhne par mai khud ko apmanit aur lajjit mahsus kar raha hoon hey sai inhe kshama karna. aapne lord shrikrishna ka ullekh kiya hai to ek bat kahna chahunga SHIRDI me jahan aaj SAIBABA virajman hai waha pahle lord krishna ka mandir banne wala tha par SAIBABA ne tab hi kah diya tha ki yaha lord krishna ki murti sthapit nahi hogi aur bhakto ke poochne par baba ne kaha tha ki waqt aane par sabko pata chal jayega. dost mujhe tum par taras aa raha hai yaha time waist karne se behtar hai ki ek bar SHIRDI ja kar baba se mafi mang kar aao mera SAI bahut dayalu hai maf kar dega tumhe. baba ne kaha hai
    JO MAJ BHAJE JAISA JAISA BHAVE TAISA TAISA PAVE MI HI TYASI
    are baba to itne dayalu hai ki virodh me hi sahi tum unka nam to le rahe ho unhe smaran to kar rahe ho kalyan kar denge tumhara bhi. ek bat aur kahunga Haridwar, Mathura, Kashi…….. SHIRDI me tirath sare hai SAIBABA ke charno me charo dham hamare hai. SHIRDI hamara vrindavan aur SHIRDI hi gokuldham hai SAI hamare krishna kanhaiyya SAI hamare ram hai. jai sai ram bandhu.

    • आप लोगो ने धर्म का मजाक बना कर रख दिया है, भगवान् दत्तात्रेय खुद एक अवतार है, क्या एक अवतार स्वयं अवतार ले सकता है,
      आप साईं भक्तो की बचकाना बाते समझ से परे है,

    • आप जो भी है पर बहुत बडे अज्ञानी है । एक व्यक्ति जो मास खाने को बढ़ावा देता हो और एक और कृष्णा जी जो गीता मैं जीव हत्या को न करने का आदेश देते है उस साईं को आप कृष्णा का अवतार बोलते हो । हस्सी अत्ति है ऐसे साईं पर और उसके भक्तो पर । यह तोह छोड़िये। । देश के लिए कुछ क्यों नहीं किया जब यह बाबा ब्रह्माण्ड नायक थ। मतलब समझते है आप ब्राह्मण्द नायक का जो सृष्टी का पालन हर हो । अरे यह होता है पालन हर जो सुबह शाम अपनी ककड आरती करवाए लोगो से और भूल गए की उसका खुद का गाव शिर्डी और वोह खुद एक घुलाम की जिंदगी जी रहा है । अरेह कुछ तोह बुद्धि लगये। ऐसा कोई भगवान् बता डे जिसने अधीनता स्वीकार की हो और पूरा जीवन जिया हो । अरेह यह तोह अंग्रेजो का विरोद तक नहीं कर पाया । भारत से अंग्रेजो को भागना तोह दूर शिर्डी तक से भगा नहीं पाया वोह क्या मेरे और मेरे देश का भला करेग। मुझे इस बाबा का तनिक भर भी डार नहीं । अपनी आंख खोलो और केवल गीता को पदों आपको संचय रहित ज्ञान मिल जायेगा । और अगर हो सके तोह वेद पुराण पढ लो वोह आपके साईं की कर्मो को गलत ही बतायेंगे

  17. koi sai charitra me mandir shabd dikhaye…
    har jageh masjid hi likhi hai

    koi sabka malik 1 dikhaye
    sab jageh allaah malik hi likha hai.

    sai avtari nahi paakhandi tha.

  18. अगर होता साईं भगवान् तोह क्यों डार का बेठा रहा शिर्डी मैं । क्यों नहीं लिया लोहा अंग्रेजो से जैसे बाकि वीरो ने लिया.. एक लक्ष्मी बाई लड़ गयी अंग्रेजो के खिलाफ एक औरत होते हुए और यह बाबा सिर्फ अपनी हिम्मत शिर्डी मैं ही दिखा सकता था । और जो लोग शाखाहरी हैं वोह भी आज से मॉस खाना शुरू कर दे क्योकि उनका साईं भी मास खाता और खिलाता थ। येही नहीं वोह तोह मास को खाने के लिए शाकाहारी ब्राह्मण तक को प्ररित करता था ।
    जो इंसान खुद ग़ुलाम बन कर रहा हो पुरी जिंदगी वो क्या दिखायेगा किसी को रौशनी ।

    मैं झूट नहीं बोलता | नहीं यकीन तोह पाढ़ लो साईं सचित्र। … साईं की तरह झूट नहीं बोलते मैं

  19. अनिरुद्ध द्विवेदी said:

    बोलो महोदय क्या कहना चाहते हो क्यूँ बुलाया है फेसबुक से यहाँ पर !!! अपना विषय स्पष्ट करो!!

  20. धनञ्जय भारद्वाज said:

    ye atyant chinta ka vishay hai ki ham bharatvasi jo har har mahadev ke nare lagate the ab ॐ sai nath ke nare lagane lage hain! ye kaun si shraddha hai jo baba logon ko bhagwan turat maan leti hai… kabhi shakti upasna ka kendra rahha bharatbhumi ke log ab apne dharm se jude ishwariya rupon par vishwas nahi karte we to naap taul karte hain ki mai kiske paas jaun ki meri mannat puri ho.. dhikkar hai aisi astha par.. samarth ramdas ne pure bharat ko hanuman ki murtiyon se paat diya tha aur ham awsarvadi log ab usi bharat ko sai ki murtiyon se paat rahe hai.. ek taraf bhagwad gita ki shapath li jati hai aur ek taraf bhagwad gita ki likhi baton ko nakara jata hai.. gita me kisi bhi samadhi ya mrit vaktiyon ko pujta hai wah pishach yoni ko prapt hota hai.. par ham to bhartiya sudhar nahi sakte

  21. sai ram sai shyam

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s